Call (407) 834-5297 or Click for a Free Consultation

Adam L. Pollack

Adam L. Pollack

Criminal Defense & Family Law Attorney

  • Home
  • Firm
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
      • Drug Crimes
      • DUI & BUI
      • Internet Crimes
      • Assault & Battery
      • Murder
      • Sex Offenses
      • Violent Crimes
      • Weapons Charges
    • Family Law
      • Divorce
    • Probate
      • Wills
  • Reviews
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Facing Federal Criminal Charges? The Discovery Rules Can Be a Minefield

adam pollack · May 10, 2018 ·

If you are facing federal criminal charges, you need to know that it is not the open discovery that you will find in local courts. It is governed strictly by Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Supreme Court cases of Brady and Giglio as well as the Jencks Act provide additional relief.

We saw this play out in the Federal case involving the Pulse nightclub shooter’s widow. The criminal defense attorney was able to use this to his client’s advantage during the trial which allowed for the client to successfully challenge the government’s evidence. Attorney Adam Pollack has many years of experience handling Federal criminal cases and can navigate this minefield to make sure your rights are protected.

Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is the chief source of law governing discovery in federal criminal cases.  Under Rule 16, once a defendant makes a demand on the government, the government is required to produce the following items:

  • the defendant’s statements,
  • the defendant’s criminal record,
  • reports of any examinations and tests, documents or other physical objects it intends to introduce at trial, and more.  
  • Rule 16 is a reciprocal rule: once the defendant invokes Rule 16 for discovery, the government can demand the same from the defendant.

Brady and Giglio

The Supreme Court has held through a series of cases, starting with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), that the government has a duty to produce exculpatory evidence to the defendant.  For example, if a defendant is suspected of murder, but the government has evidence that a DNA test conducted on the murder weapon does not match the defendant, the government must produce that evidence to the defendant.

Orlando Law federal charges, guilty criminal

Recent Blog Posts

  • The Importance of Recording Your Police Encounter
  • Florida’s Intestate Succession Laws: What Happens When There’s No Will?
  • Protecting Your Rights as an Heir or Beneficiary in Florida Probate
  • The Role of Psychologists, Medical Professionals, and Other Experts in the Defense of Sex Crime Cases in Florida
  • Social Media’s Influence on Public Opinion and Legal Proceedings in Florida Sex Crime Cases
  • Sex Crimes and Penalties in the State of Florida
  • Florida Sex Offender Registration Laws: Requirements and Potential Legal Challenges
  • Challenging Unfounded or False Accusations of Sex Crimes in Florida
  • Consent in Sex Crime Cases in Florida
  • The Role of DNA Testing in Florida Sex Crime Trials

Office Location
3544 Edgewater Drive
Orlando FL 32804

Phone
(407) 834-5297

Fax
(407) 834-1841

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Our Firm
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

©2025 Adam L. Pollack. All Rights Reserved.